From Journey Mapping to Journey Management: An AI-Prototyped Proposal for Verizon's CX Practice

Themes

Journey Management, AI-Supported Rapid Prototyping, Organizational Strategy, Design Governance

Methods

Systemic Gap Analysis, Stakeholder Research, AI Rapid Prototyping, Operating Model Design

Role

Experience Designer, Design Strategist

Collaborators

Erin Reeg (Experience Design Lead)
M Lee (Sr. Experience Designer)
Yasmeen Masri (Experience Designer)

Organization

Verizon CX Design - Experience Architecture

About The Work

Over 1.5 years, the Customer Intent team built Verizon's foundational infrastructure for customer-centric design: a 70-intent inventory, an 11-play self-service Playbook, and 6 service blueprints spanning digital, retail, and assisted channels.

But institutionalizing that foundation across a matrixed enterprise hit structural limits self-service couldn't solve. Domain knowledge sat fractured across teams, cross-functional partners worked in incompatible tools with conflicting definitions, and most critically, Verizon's products changed faster than any static blueprint could track. A document was accurate the day it published and degraded from there, with no way for one team's changes to surface as context for another team downstream in the same journey.

I proposed a shift: instead of a consultative team producing static artifacts, our team needed to evolve into the governance body orchestrating Verizon's Journey Management Ecosystem: an operating model built on three competencies (Insights, Design, Orchestration), moving from point-in-time documentation to a living, continuously updated view of the customer journey.

About Verizon's Customer Intent Framework

Customer Intent is Verizon’s internal framework for organizing customer needs around what they are actually trying to accomplish during their interactions with Verizon, rather than around internal product verticals or channel structures. It encourages Verizon team members to approach problems from the customer’s lens and act accordingly, rather than focusing on siloed business objectives. 

By the time this case study was written, each intent had multiple pathways documented through service blueprints and customer journey maps, and the team had documented 6 service blueprints on 6 Customer Intents.

To become a more strategic partner to the business, instead of a consultative team producing static artifacts, our team needed to evolve into the governance body orchestrating Verizon's Journey Management Ecosystem: an operating model built on three competencies (Insights, Design, Orchestration)

Process

Diagnosing the systemic blockers

Institutionalizing the customer-centric design across the enterprise faced three structural frictions: 

  • Siloed domain knowledge and fragmented historical context across teams;
  • Blind spots from restricted access to clean customer analytics outside a single research team; and
  • Incompatible tools and conflicting definitions between cross-functional partners
Underneath all three, sat a deeper problem: self-service resources like the Customer Intent Playbook and blueprint inventory couldn’t scale without continuous human interpretation, and the blueprints themselves were degraded the moment they were published, with no democratized, dynamic way to keep them current.

Reframing the model

I proposed a shift from journey mapping: a tactical, one-off exercise producing a fixed artifact, to journey management: an ongoing strategic practice that continuously measures, shares, governs, and optimizes experience, directly connecting design decisions to business and organizational outcomes. This meant the team was operating at the intersection of three competencies:

  • Addressing channel-agnostic moments that matter for customers across the journey
  • Surfacing and communicating insights on these moments to the right teams and stakeholders
  • Contextualizing high-impact journeys for optimization, so doing orchestration and not just documentation

Proving the technical concept: Prototyping with AI

To prove "continuous and dynamic" wasn't just aspirational language, I proposed and helped shape a working prototype: an interactive tool that hosts live blueprints across intents and is tracked with a shared Customer Effort Score. Erin Reeg, my manager, led the technical build of a Gantt-style mapping tool in VS Code using Gemini and Figma, while I structured the data and shaped what the tool needed to surface to be useful for anyone mapping a journey. Using prompts, wireframes, and examples, we outlined each major page, then uploaded the existing 70+ intent inventory via CSV and refined the prototype over a few weeks.

Including the Customer Intents in the prototype

Each intent maps to multiple blueprints, and each blueprint's pain and delight points are tagged by type (relationship, journey, or interaction), then tallied into a bar graph. Every blueprint also gets a Customer Effort Score, showing how well that intent is currently working for customers.

At creation, each blueprint captures which channel the task happens in, what role the customer holds, and what the improvement goal is. From the customer's perspective, a blueprint displays each phase as a storyboard (objectives, steps, moments of truth, and sentiment) with phase scores averaging into the blueprint's overall CES.

The blueprint tools also allows users to create blueprints of multiple scenarios and pathways, for example if a customer is an Account Owner vs only a member

Designing the operating model

To move the team from an optional “consulting partner” to a built-in governance checkpoint, I proposed four levers: shared ecosystem performance review cadences with design groups, embedding the team directly into CX Design’s regular syncs and milestone reviews, and formal co-ownership of “Intent Health Score” reviews with the Customer & Market Intelligence (CMI) team, and dedicated cross-team channels and office hours for ongoing support.

Journey management is an ongoing strategic practice that continuously measures, shares, governs, and optimizes experience, directly connecting design decisions to business and organizational outcomes.

Outcomes & Learnings

The prototype validated that a living, continuously updated model was technically achievable, not just theoretically sound. When we did our concept testing with our Verizon colleagues (the journey maps and blueprint users in the company), they confirmed that it addressed a genuine gap, and the Customer Effort Score metric surfaced friction patterns that static, one-off blueprints had never made visible. 

However, before the proposal moved toward adoption, the team was restructured, and the initiative didn’t continue past this stage. Regardless, the work demonstrated that even at proof-of-concept, closing a structural gap at Verizon’s scale required proposing a change to the team’s mandate and ways of working, not just a better artifact. As a Strategist, AI-assisted prototyping in this case also let me test that argument technically and more tangibly, rather than leaving it as a slide deck that is hard to evaluate against a working model.

Explore More Projects